wednes: (Default)
wednes ([personal profile] wednes) wrote2006-09-08 05:17 am

OMF'nG!

Have you all seen the totally disturbing, excruciating minute of video of the "mom" who laughs at her kid as he almost dies from falling from an amusement park ride? The caption says "Mom" but I think the kid calls her Janice. In either event, if I see this bitch, she's DEAD! Okay, not really. But this woman is vile.
In all seriousness, I debated posting this because it's really upsetting. For now, I'm pretending that it is staged.



I got a new toothbrush this week. I used to have this one, which was pretty good. But the heads are not replacable and you need, get this--BATTERIES. What kind of self respecting product requires me to purchase multiple batteries just to use it? I daresay that technology has progressed to the point where such an annoyance should be well past eliminated. With that in mind, I procured this which I like very much. I like having a fresh charge on it every morning and night. Nice, powerful vibrations--on the toothbrush. You people are pervs!

As I may have mentioned, I have an abiding fondness for Granola Bars. I gave up almost all candy and am having granola bars in its place. You have to watch out for them because sometimes it's a close call between a granola bar and a candy bar. Case in point, are the Sweet "N Salty approximation made by Reese's. Yeah, the candy guys. Hershey makes one too. Everybody's getting in on the act of imitating my favorite granola bar. That's good for me, the consumer. Anyway, these Reese's bars are tiny. Very tiny, and far too sweet IMHO. I maintain that the Nature Valley ones are still the best. I like the mixed nut variety, but the peanut and almond are both very tasty.


I'm pleased to say that I had a good meeting with my Life Coach today (well, yesterday now). It turns out, she is much smarter than she let on, and her plan makes a lot of sense to me. Thankfully, I went ahead and did all the assignments even though they were annoying and emotional and I didn't see the point. So I'm glad that it turned out not to be a collosal waste of my time, even though I do have to take the damn Meyer Briggs again. Further, I am glad that I didn't give up right away like I planned.
She pointed out something today that I had never thought of. You'll catch me saying pretty often How does so-and-so get all these great jobs, they SUCK! I'm increasingly sure that I don't suck, so it was baffling me that (without trying to sound like a dick) people who clearly had less intelligence, less creativity, and less applied knowlege than me were getting jobs that I was already lowering my standards to take. Damn, that sounds pompous as hell, but it's true. The revelation was that I am not a follower. That and I'm totally discounting the importance of environment in terms of succeeding on the job. I am reminded of John Locke (the one from LOST) who was miserable in his crappy job until a firey plane crash improved his life and gave it meanning--until the season 2 finale anyway.
The point being that there really are aspects of this situation that I hadn't been looking at. It now seems more possible for me to really get the kind of job I want. And the Life Coach has this awesome system that's all about psychology and chakras, brain structure and archetypes...fascinating shit. I'm very interested to see how this all works out.






[identity profile] nate101000.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem is that she continued to laugh after it was clear that the kid was in serious distress. The kid wasn't trying to get candy, he was falling out of a ride that was hanging in the air high enough to kill him. It was more than legitimate. The Mom/Janice is an aweful person.

[identity profile] uterdic.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Perceived distress is different than real distress, and we don't know which the case was here. Again, maybe the kids was fine and had his feet on the platform below, and was just being whiny. We don't know that, but it's as much (or more) of an option than him being in legitimite danger.

[identity profile] nate101000.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I think what you are talking about is perceived or real danger. The distress was very real even if the danger was minimal. It doesn't matter whether or not we think it's legitimate distress. The kid did think it he was in real danger, and he's in the best position to make that determination. And it's pretty obvious that he wasn't secured properly.

What we do know is that one person was hanging by a strap at his neck that should have been at his sternum and screaming for help. And the other person was laughing the entire time, even after it became obvious that the kid was in a state of panic and possibly in danger.

[identity profile] uterdic.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, danger vs distress. You are correct.

What I saw was a kid suspended by his armpits, not his neck, and that was after the motion had pretty much stopped. It rode up on his neck sure, but it was the armpits that were holding him there. He didn't fit into it well, but the likelyhood of him falling out seemed minimal from my take and experience on them.

The kid was paniced, yes, but I've seen literally just as much panic from an 9 year old kid who wouldn't go into a bathroom in a restaurant on his own. To me, I see it like when you see a kid hit their head and look to the parent to learn how to react. If the mom jumps in and says, "Oh my baby. What happened, are you ok oh my gosh, oh no!!" the kid is going to start screaming everytime they get a hangnail.

Again, obviously either of us could be on the right track if she was neglecting his screams, and in real danger, or if he was just a whiny pansy who needed to get a grip and deal with it. I hope it's the latter because I do believe it is the more likely scenario (meaning that accidents do happen but hundreds of people ride that everyday, and they tend to work pretty hard at making sure bad things don't happen. It's not like it's a county fair, I hope).

[identity profile] nate101000.livejournal.com 2006-09-11 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Why do you keep comparing an amusement park ride to a store? She didn't even LOOK at him! She couldn't possibly have known that he wasn't in real danger. She assumed it. His reaction and behavior are perfectly reasonable.