![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Writer's Block: Do (political) opposites attract?
[Error: unknown template qotd]
Honestly, no.
I have friends who are anti-choice, who voted for Bush (twice even). I know Christians, Wiccans, non-Wiccan Pagans, Buddhists, staunch Athiests, Muslims, Jews, and devout agnostics that I think are just swell people. I even have a a friend or two who still make racist comments on occasion. When you accept someone into your life, you accept the totality of that person, right or wrong.
Does this mean that I sit silently when someone is spouting something I deem to be utterly batshit? No, of course not. I always enjoy a spirited socio-political or even religious discussion. That's why we have free speech, after all. So I'm totally into chatting it up, even heatedly. I'm also not opposed to pointing out that some people gain their beliefs from dubious sources that lead me to doubt their veracity or validity. If you were raised Christian and didn't meet an openly gay person until you were 25, you can be forgiven (IMHO) for having some whacked ideas about homosexuality. If you weren't allowed to watch TV or eat junk food until college, you may actually NOT be a huge dick for implying that only ghetto dwellers drink coca-cola instead of water. If your minister told you from babyhood that dinosaurs never existed because they weren't in the Bible, you should maybe not be laughed at for thinking Jurrassic Park is every bit as blasphemous as The DaVinci Code (even if it is substancially better written). However, it may behoove you to open your mind a bit, and let some new opinions in. Besides, you learn a lot more from talking with people you disagree with than with people who sit around agreeing with each other.
But Wednes, you might say, I happen to know that you've unfriended and disinvited people to your events because of arguments about politics or social issues. This is not entirely true. You are free to think, feel, say and believe anything you want. Honest. What you can't do is be a disrespectful dick about it. You don't get to do the following things:
1. Cite "facts" that have no tangible evidence to back them up. "Insurance comapanies don't make a profit," "People on welfare live better than I do," "Most women only have abortions as a convenience," are all statements that require actual facts to back them up. Note: Opinion-based commentators are not spouting facts just because they're on TV.
2. Tell other people they they are immoral for disagreeing. Admittedly, I do think people are assholes for saying that poor people don't deserve the same medical care as rich people. That is also against the hippocratic oath. But I'm not going to tell them they're going to hell, or are going to be reincarnated as a dung beetle because we disagree. Neither should you (see above for facts v opinions)
3. Harass or badger people in an effort to "convince them" of your side. I'm all about discussions, even long ones with raised voices on occasion. But presuming that people would agree with you if you could just find the magical phrase that convinces them that you know best--you are displaying very little respect for them and their opinions. Not cool.
4. Presume that you have a monopoly on truth, political correctness, or that it's up to you alone to decide what others should be offended by.
5. Make presumptions about any group of people you do not personally keep time with. Also included: making presumption based on one person you don't actually know as if they are a microcosm of an entire group of people.
6. People who disagree may not be stupid, misguided, brainwashed, heartless, or liberal tree-huggers, unless of course they actually hug trees. ;-] So no namecalling unless someone is already being a serious prick.
There's probably more, but that's all I can think of at the mo. I'm at work, so my thinker is otherwise engaged.
Honestly, no.
I have friends who are anti-choice, who voted for Bush (twice even). I know Christians, Wiccans, non-Wiccan Pagans, Buddhists, staunch Athiests, Muslims, Jews, and devout agnostics that I think are just swell people. I even have a a friend or two who still make racist comments on occasion. When you accept someone into your life, you accept the totality of that person, right or wrong.
Does this mean that I sit silently when someone is spouting something I deem to be utterly batshit? No, of course not. I always enjoy a spirited socio-political or even religious discussion. That's why we have free speech, after all. So I'm totally into chatting it up, even heatedly. I'm also not opposed to pointing out that some people gain their beliefs from dubious sources that lead me to doubt their veracity or validity. If you were raised Christian and didn't meet an openly gay person until you were 25, you can be forgiven (IMHO) for having some whacked ideas about homosexuality. If you weren't allowed to watch TV or eat junk food until college, you may actually NOT be a huge dick for implying that only ghetto dwellers drink coca-cola instead of water. If your minister told you from babyhood that dinosaurs never existed because they weren't in the Bible, you should maybe not be laughed at for thinking Jurrassic Park is every bit as blasphemous as The DaVinci Code (even if it is substancially better written). However, it may behoove you to open your mind a bit, and let some new opinions in. Besides, you learn a lot more from talking with people you disagree with than with people who sit around agreeing with each other.
But Wednes, you might say, I happen to know that you've unfriended and disinvited people to your events because of arguments about politics or social issues. This is not entirely true. You are free to think, feel, say and believe anything you want. Honest. What you can't do is be a disrespectful dick about it. You don't get to do the following things:
1. Cite "facts" that have no tangible evidence to back them up. "Insurance comapanies don't make a profit," "People on welfare live better than I do," "Most women only have abortions as a convenience," are all statements that require actual facts to back them up. Note: Opinion-based commentators are not spouting facts just because they're on TV.
2. Tell other people they they are immoral for disagreeing. Admittedly, I do think people are assholes for saying that poor people don't deserve the same medical care as rich people. That is also against the hippocratic oath. But I'm not going to tell them they're going to hell, or are going to be reincarnated as a dung beetle because we disagree. Neither should you (see above for facts v opinions)
3. Harass or badger people in an effort to "convince them" of your side. I'm all about discussions, even long ones with raised voices on occasion. But presuming that people would agree with you if you could just find the magical phrase that convinces them that you know best--you are displaying very little respect for them and their opinions. Not cool.
4. Presume that you have a monopoly on truth, political correctness, or that it's up to you alone to decide what others should be offended by.
5. Make presumptions about any group of people you do not personally keep time with. Also included: making presumption based on one person you don't actually know as if they are a microcosm of an entire group of people.
6. People who disagree may not be stupid, misguided, brainwashed, heartless, or liberal tree-huggers, unless of course they actually hug trees. ;-] So no namecalling unless someone is already being a serious prick.
There's probably more, but that's all I can think of at the mo. I'm at work, so my thinker is otherwise engaged.
no subject
I shouldn't start sentences with "and", but I did it anyway. I'm a rebel. You don't even know what I'm capable of!
See that? I ended my sentence with a preposition. Oh man, I'm flying off the handle this morning!
no subject
And I fully support taking some license with traditional rules of grammar and sentence structure. Go on with your bad self, Stranger!