Best Lj School Listing EVAR!!!
And I'm so bummed I didn't think of it myself.
Just keep in mind that the real school will have to be at least three times this size...
While I'm here, I beleive I'll post my one word review of the Family Guy movie: Meh. As we observed during the special features, "mildly amused" pretty much sums it up. Some very funny moments, and a slightly better plot than we often get on the TV. But all in all, I didn't laugh as much as I expected it to do. You'd think people would have learned from South Park that shocking us with vulgarity is fine but it's still absolutley critical that you be funny.
Myself, I only do funny in a casual way. I would never attempt to do it professionally. In all seriousness, I think that comedy writers tend to be more screwed up emotionally than people who do horror. No, I'm not basing this on anything but my own impressions. But I think horror writers (the good ones, not the book equivalent of a slasher movie) are more prone to be introspective. They probably have a better understanding of insanity just because they need it for thier work. Comedy writers, OTOH, are funny to keep from dealing with overwhelming things plaguing them in real life: repression, rage, intense fears, all kinds of crap. I guess I suspect this because that's what I use comedy for in real life, but my writing is totally separate from that. My writing is much more sarcastic than funny, which I guess sarcasm is just wit with a bunch of anger thrown in for good measure. Anyone feel me on this?
Just keep in mind that the real school will have to be at least three times this size...
While I'm here, I beleive I'll post my one word review of the Family Guy movie: Meh. As we observed during the special features, "mildly amused" pretty much sums it up. Some very funny moments, and a slightly better plot than we often get on the TV. But all in all, I didn't laugh as much as I expected it to do. You'd think people would have learned from South Park that shocking us with vulgarity is fine but it's still absolutley critical that you be funny.
Myself, I only do funny in a casual way. I would never attempt to do it professionally. In all seriousness, I think that comedy writers tend to be more screwed up emotionally than people who do horror. No, I'm not basing this on anything but my own impressions. But I think horror writers (the good ones, not the book equivalent of a slasher movie) are more prone to be introspective. They probably have a better understanding of insanity just because they need it for thier work. Comedy writers, OTOH, are funny to keep from dealing with overwhelming things plaguing them in real life: repression, rage, intense fears, all kinds of crap. I guess I suspect this because that's what I use comedy for in real life, but my writing is totally separate from that. My writing is much more sarcastic than funny, which I guess sarcasm is just wit with a bunch of anger thrown in for good measure. Anyone feel me on this?

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hmmm...I grasp the point...
But it seems like every angst-ridden writer thinks he or she can write Horror, and speaking as someone who's worked as a Submissions Editor, most of them can't do a publishable job of it. Just like every drunk thinks he (or she) can tell a joke. But look at the ones who are proficient enough to make money at writing Horror or Humor, and I'm not sure one group outclasses the other, in being well-balanced.
(Incidentally, I would generally classify your work as demonstrating a more professional attitude than most, so I'm not damning you to the "angst-ridden writer who thinks she can write Horror" pile. In case you wondered...)
As for actual Performers...well, it helps to be a bit unbalanced, in that field...
Also, I tend to distinguish between different varieties of writer (humor AND horror)...there are a lot of writers who can come up with story ideas that follow a certain formula, and it doesn't have to come from any deeply-felt emotion, one way or the other. Take a look at the reprints of TALES FROM THE CRYPT, for instance...those horror stories are mostly as mechanical as a mousetrap, but they make a satisfying SNAP. Most TV comedies also follow a specific pattern, satisfying to viewers, but not really an evocation of the writers' deep need to express something.
One of my favorite personal examples was a discussion I had with a girlfriend, years ago; she favored very personal, very gut-level horror...I prefer writing horror with a structure, because it CAN embody personal feelings, but a story that follows familiar patterns is more likely to get a positive reaction from the reader. She thought this was utterly trivial crap. Then I told her a story I had worked-out which was really quite disturbing, and she was much impressed with it...until I explained the underlying structure and that the premise was based on wordplay; it absolutely RUINED the effect for her. She wanted the story to be dredged-up from my deepest unspoken nightmares, and underneath it was just a pun, gussied-up to resemble a nightmare. Happily, most people need never see the gears and pulleys...they just experience the story. And so it goes for comedy writing. The more structure, the fewer belly-laughs likely...but you leave the audience wanting more. The most successful material will always strike a good balance.
Re: Hmmm...I grasp the point...
I have done a few short stories that are structured and have a punchy ending. Even though they get good responses, I just don't like them as much as the more personal accounts of real life terror. They just don't mean as much to me.
That said, my approach to NaNoWriMo this year is something more structured so I can see how organic I can still be with character development. I really hope it's possible that I can write something structured with wide appeal and still be true to myself. I suspect that an MFA in creative writing would help me there. As soon as I get it together to take the GRE, I'm going to start applying. Of course, I've been saying that for several years now.
Re: Hmmm...I grasp the point...
The best result is when the reader is so wrapped-up in the story, there is no sense that it is following a pattern. At best, there should be a delicious moment where the reader wonders, "Where is this GOING?!" ...but the challenge is to make sure that it actually goes somewhere.
My favorite example of a movie that gets almost all the way there, is JEEPERS CREEPERS...and then the last five minutes fall completely flat, ruining all that has gone before. I've had a roomful of people shout "THAT'S the ENDING!?" when I showed it to them. And if you listen to the Director's commentary, he thinks it's a GOOD ending!
Re: Hmmm...I grasp the point...
Actually, ID4 was also this way. Started out with scary alien action and ended up a pandering peice of fluff. Damn shame.
Re: Hmmm...I grasp the point...
Adam Ant acting with Blythe Danner was priceless...much like Malcom McDowell feasting on the blood of George Wendt.
Crypt
And the shows were pretty cool, too!
Re: Crypt